One thing about the
reading that surprised me is that creativity can be developed and improved. I
thought creativity was something that individuals either have or didn’t have. I
was also surprised that there were four phases to the creative process. My belief
was that creative thinking just popped into people’s minds like a light bulb
lighting up.
One part of the reading
that was confusing to me was that unexpected occurrences lead to innovation. I
thought that innovation is more useful before the disaster strikes.
One question I would ask
the author would be if he was a manager of a company which arena of creativity
would he wish his employees used the most of? The second question
Is Creativity vs.
innovation, which is better for an entrepreneur to be developed at? Both highly
creative and highly innovative people seem to be the most successful.
I disagree when the author
said that for creativity to occur, chaos is necessary. I don’t think a structured
and focus chaos is necessary to creativity. I believe that using the word chaos
is a bit extreme.
No comments:
Post a Comment