The biggest surprise for
me in the reading was the lack of penetration in the market of microfinance.
Like the article states, only 19% of the market has been taken over. This is a
huge sign of underperformance.
I was confused to why a
gang of local thugs intimidated, attacked, and stole cash from some of the loan
officers.
The first question I would
ask the author is if the market penetration is increasing or decreasing? It
would be interesting to see if more companies like SKS sprout up. The second
question I would ask would be where do you see SKS in ten years? Will the growth
continue?
I think the author was
wrong about putting a market penetration percentage of 19% in a bad context. Although
it is not ideal, at least there is some growth. I like 19% can be looked at as
a good starting point.
No comments:
Post a Comment